HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150407
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '19 at 16:07
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	20%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 150 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 388 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 176B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Lighting 5.33 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 7.16 4% 6.15 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 5.27 Splatting 6 4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 200 188 179 161 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 404 Write 344 Mixed 283 SusWrite 199 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 29.5 98% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 186 183% 291 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 104%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 70GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 98 84 81 83 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 41 Write 58.4 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 87.6 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 12GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	227x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	492x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	296x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	19x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16