PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 17.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110311 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 31 '19 at 18:43 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5630
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
|
3.9%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 4 24 5.2 4.8 2.8 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
104GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 96 98 98 98 98 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 26 27 27 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 297x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 272x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 251x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 143x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 123x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 97x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 52x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |