Gigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 374 48% 365 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1455) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 37.3 32% 35.4 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 35.7 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253TD480G 480GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 406 433 427 429 429 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 432 Mixed 407 SusWrite 393 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 63 192% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 136 166% 291 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB 2,714 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 13GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 26 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 82.3 Write 32.9 Mixed 15 SusWrite 27.2 44% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 64% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87N-WIFI Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87N-WIFI

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	18x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	16x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $50Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	9x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	11x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16