PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3067-A1 |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120719 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 16:55 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 63% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 436.30
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 346 283 204 190 157 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
83GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 223 239 244 245 245 MB/s
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
265GB free
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 473 581 657 676 706 MB/s
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.3 1.9 0.6 0.9 0.6 MB/s
|
5.69%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-890.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 12x |
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 11x |
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 9x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 7x |
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $544 |