Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 553
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 8.03
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.09
6% 9.13 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 16.3
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.4% Below average
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 59.6
28% 54.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 65
Splatting 67.2
54% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 434
Mixed 284
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 36.2
135% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 247
200% 282 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
344GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 147 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 156
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 149
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 112%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
875GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 144 147 147 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 162
Write 143
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 146
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback