Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 435 54% 413 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 094E) 512MB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 33 33 31 36 34 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 145 Write 112 Mixed 171 SusWrite 41.4 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 27.4 112% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 102 101% 167 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 116%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 8GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 0300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 2.6 8% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.8 96% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 14%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 64GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 39GB free, PID 8008 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.9 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 19.2 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 16.8 27% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	589x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	459x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	459x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	557x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	240x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	193x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $425

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16