ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo M980NU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Clevo M980NU (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO M980NU
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '16 at 04:14
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172 660 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 479, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 71 40% 58.6 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 138 19% 139 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M 161 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Clevo(1558 9800) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Lighting 9.13 Reflection 8.31 Parallax 2.72 7% 6.72 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.37 Splatting 3.91 3% 3.78 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 931GB free Firmware: JB0O Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 120 Write 130 Mixed 123 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.2 77% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS727575A9E 750GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 302GB free Firmware: JF4O Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 95.9 Mixed 104 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.23 80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 65%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$21 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: DEM9 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 103 Write 105 Mixed 102 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 4.37 4K Mixed 0.18 111% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 64%
Seagate External 2TB 680 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 3332 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 30.5 Mixed 29.8 38% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.18 24% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 64%
WD 320AS External 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 69GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.9% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 31 Mixed 30.7 40% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.35 64% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback