Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 18:32
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.7% Very good
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
82% 174 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 713
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 916
62% 916 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.1% Average
Lighting 224
Reflection 261
Parallax 268
59% 251 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 143
Splatting 153
42% 144 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 104%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,550
Write 1,332
Mixed 516
250% 1,133 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 40.8
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 628
486% 669 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 258%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$85
11GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 276
Write 238
Mixed 242
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 29.8
102% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 188
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
97GB free
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 292 284 284 283 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 283
Mixed 204
SusWrite 287
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 33
144% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 126
128% 210 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 180 180 182 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 130
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 182
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$55
270GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 196 194 190 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 143
Mixed 86
SusWrite 189
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 136 135 137 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 128
Write 144
Mixed 105
SusWrite 137
177% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
67.4% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 3,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $986
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback