HP 205G3A/E27110/32p/4X/50f PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 205G3A/E27110/32p/4X/50f PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8245
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 00:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 54
29% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 103
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 98.8
6% 98.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8245) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 2.75
2% 2.95 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 275 298 306 334 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 418
Write 331
Mixed 319
SusWrite 302
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 27.6
88% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 120
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback