Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 31.3 1-Core 13.6 2-Core 27.3 17% 24.1 Pts	4-Core 28.6 8-Core 29.4 4% 29 Pts	64-Core 28.3 2% 28.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 85 92 100 85 88 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17% Very poor	Read 136 Write 89.2 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 92.7 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 5.3 19% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.01% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	2x
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3150ED58E8W1600 1x2GBRamaxelBench 23%, 670 samples	1x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	1x
RMT3170EB68E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 29%, 609 samples	1x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $120

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16