LG F3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLG F3  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-16371
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit색, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080905
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 01:32
Run Duration2492 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 20.9
30% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 18.8
8-Core 60.9
4% 39.8 Pts
64-Core 46.4
3% 46.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
MSI(1462 3FF3) 384MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.13%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 137 133 144 102 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 168
Write 225
Mixed 203
SusWrite 140
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 29.1
99% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 81
71% 106 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback