Gigabyte Z370 HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 HD3  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime16.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8400-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.2% Very good
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
81% 172 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 599
67% 518 Pts
64-Core 642
43% 642 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$346
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
41.7% Average
Lighting 143
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
38% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
42% 143 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$83
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 172 159 152 139 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 498
Mixed 215
SusWrite 190
137% 634 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 38.2
121% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 44.8
DQ Mixed 532
342% 411 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 131%
Great: 246%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$107
652GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 462 460 467 472 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 470
Mixed 393
SusWrite 466
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.6
174% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 359
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$81
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 8,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback