Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150 8,564 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 68 40% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 147 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2128G 128GB 2,128 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 46 40 53 37 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.6% Below average	Read 206 Write 195 Mixed 161 SusWrite 49.3 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 17.4 56% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 32.6 27% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 192GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 70 49 48 55 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 99 Write 102 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 59.8 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 68%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 282GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 46 46 44 60 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 62.8 Write 64.8 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 52.9 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.6 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.9 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $465

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16