Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	4.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 18:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 173 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 447 44% 361 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XFX(1682 9385) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.1 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35% Below average	Lighting 42.4 Reflection 49 Parallax 52.6 35% 48 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 45.2 Splatting 38.7 36% 44.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS120G2G0A-00JH30 120GB 841 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8381c75 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.9 8.1 9.6 12 20 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 130 Write 65.7 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 11.3 14% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 17.4 65% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 18.4 18% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 81%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 404GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.37% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 12.7 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 13.1 10% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KY996D-ELD Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 9905471-001.A01LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.8% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16