Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3450-$214
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
60.7% Good
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 187
67% 142 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 354
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 360
24% 360 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 95.2
19% 76 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 87.2
Splatting 56
24% 70 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$128
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 436 442 450 439 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 430
Mixed 428
SusWrite 438
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 41.8
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$78
11GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 70 76 68 80 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 45.3
Write 110
Mixed 54
SusWrite 74.9
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$50
209GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 95 97 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 103
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: V56OA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 62
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 61.8
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $950
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $645SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback