| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170316 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '20 at 11:32 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.1%
Good
|
67% 108 Pts
|
41% 306 Pts
|
19% 308 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
18% 19.7 fps
|
17% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 41 5.4 139 88 95 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
57% 258 MB/s
|
54% 17.2 MB/s
|
46% 79.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.8%
Good
|
68% 23.6 GB/s
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
50% 79.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 619 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 146x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 130x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $337 |