Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150402
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 162 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 355 41% 318 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 82.8 56% 70.2 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 79.4 55% 65.6 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,568 Write 931 Mixed 4,596 743% 3,365 MB/s	4K Read 383 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 246 977% 261 MB/s	DQ Read 758 DQ Write 2.6 DQ Mixed 475 321% 412 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 69GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 87 82 82 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 70.9 Write 83.1 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 82.8 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 109%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$21 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 251GB free Firmware: SM14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 90 86 89 91 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 78.7 Write 61.8 Mixed 50 SusWrite 88.1 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 19.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G PLUS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	11x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	6x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 27 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16