Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FA
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 157
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 353
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1961) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 6.28
5% 6.96 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 12
8% 8.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 396 396 399 372 348 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 1,222
Mixed 698
SusWrite 410
193% 861 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 52.6
185% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 625
465% 615 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 154%
Great: 179%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
60GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 24 24 24 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 203
Write 27.5
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 24.2
82% 81 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 8.6
832% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 11.2
1,017% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.5% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback