Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-9400F-$150
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
84% 179 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 659
73% 562 Pts
64-Core 663
44% 663 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$214
PNY(196E 1325) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2003 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 265
Reflection 212
Parallax 226
70% 234 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 227
Splatting 0.1
61% 122 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$32
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 83 15 13 9.9 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 172
Write 94.7
Mixed 210
SusWrite 63
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 25.7
100% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 117
114% 181 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 89%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$77
466GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1225 818 828 833 828 828 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,860
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 894
356% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64.5
199% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,541
DQ Write 1,335
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,041% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 284%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$55
482GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 29 40 38 48 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 66
SusWrite 39.1
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$38
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
37.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $468
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback