Performance Results


Gaming 167% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 172% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181012
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 00:18
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 299 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,172 105% 887 Pts	64-Core 1,628 101% 1,628 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Lighting 235 Reflection 235 Parallax 258 192% 243 fps	MRender 272 Gravity 232 Splatting 140 168% 215 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 602 614 617 595 573 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 2,292 Mixed 1,302 SusWrite 636 374% 1,680 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 68.6 247% 88.9 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 366 DQ Mixed 439 324% 428 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 282 101 47 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 478 Mixed 394 SusWrite 164 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 52 176% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 244 192% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 670GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 485 483 473 480 476 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 481 Mixed 460 SusWrite 480 109% 482 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 97.6 4K Mixed 54.3 180% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 97.3 DQ Mixed 51.3 43% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.3% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.7 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 24 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 131%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16