Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Rampage II Extreme  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 07:44
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 420
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 27
Parallax 34.7
21% 29 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 26.9
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 224 225 215 219 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.6% Above average
Read 226
Write 86.9
Mixed 180
SusWrite 206
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 30.3
92% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 109
100% 154 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
39GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 53 52 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 59.1
Mixed 49
SusWrite 51.8
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 58%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
12GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 51 51 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 52.2
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 50.1
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
960GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 85 86 81 84 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 111
Write 85.8
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 79.8
108% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 59%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
77GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 20.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 18.7
26% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
23GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 24 17 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 26.6
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 24.7
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $301
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback