Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 85.6 1-Core 79 2-Core 148 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 185 20% 161 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 106 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 162B) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.31 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 144 137 126 143 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 228 Write 165 Mixed 154 SusWrite 140 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 17.2 56% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 66.8 59% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	340x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	3x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $183

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16