PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 5.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7519 |
Motherboard | MSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 5.5 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100107 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Feb 02 '20 at 10:17 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.4
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 15 66 41 8.7 60 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
149GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 102 102 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
301GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 54 55 53 55 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 512, 2048 MB
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 2x |
Pentium E6600Intel $50Bench 39%, 5,119 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 3x |
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples | 2x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $214 |