Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '20 at 08:22
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 490 65% 489 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.73 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 4.78 4% 4.65 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.09 4% 5.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL250GB-D8 250GB 554 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1115F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 261 97 387 97 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 1,520 Write 94.9 Mixed 161 SusWrite 207 106% 496 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 21.8 130% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 503 DQ Write 94.6 DQ Mixed 190 167% 262 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 199%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 9.2 8.9 9.2 8.8 9.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 8.7 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 8.4 22% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.2 210% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 23.1 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 22.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	728x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	165x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	160x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	183x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	162x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	198x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16