Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V11.1
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	18.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 147 59% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 376 36% 299 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 48.3 20% 44.7 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 82.1 42% 45.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 326 320 328 330 328 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,570 Write 1,112 Mixed 750 SusWrite 350 210% 945 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 44 168% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 735 DQ Write 506 DQ Mixed 685 494% 642 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 765GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 132 134 133 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 121 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 133 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GB 499 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V11.1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	4x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	3x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	3x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	1x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 79%, 1,187 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 499 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16