Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 20:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 94.8
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 162
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 384
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 60.7
55% 65.4 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 57.3
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 129 131 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 344
Write 240
Mixed 243
SusWrite 128
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 31.2
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 140
108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
83GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 134 137 137 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 347
Write 246
Mixed 255
SusWrite 134
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 32.2
113% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 114
97% 142 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 116%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 26.2
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-149.A01LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-149.A01LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback