Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 125 60% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 374 39% 313 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.4 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 49.6 Parallax 42.2 29% 42.6 fps	MRender 49.7 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 34.7 33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 482 484 483 484 484 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 32GB free Firmware: M0MU033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 356 149 144 139 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 294 Write 348 Mixed 266 SusWrite 211 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 26.2 87% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 33.2 31% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 BLS8G3D1609DS Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 800, 667, 800, 667 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 13.5 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16