Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 00:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 791
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.62
6% 9.12 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 16.2
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 44.4
38% 48.7 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 61.3
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 643 641 633 638 634 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1,662
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 669
306% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 78.3
258% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,171
880% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 243%
Great: 296%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 118
Write 90.5
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 96.2
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 115 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 112
Mixed 71
SusWrite 116
137% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 26.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback