Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 00:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
1-Core 116
2-Core 250
85% 183 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 592
72% 541 Pts
64-Core 646
43% 646 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 27.6
5% 26.4 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 37.3
7% 29 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
41.5% Average
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
37% 142 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 141
42% 142 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 100%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 643 641 633 638 634 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1,662
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 669
306% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 78.3
258% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,171
880% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 243%
Great: 289%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 118
Write 90.5
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 96.2
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 115 117 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 112
Mixed 71
SusWrite 116
137% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 26.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback