ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer AX3950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer AX3950 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FIH57
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100505
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.6% Above average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 130 55% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 189 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0447) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2141 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1.37 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 293GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 30 33 35 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 101 Write 25.5 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 33.4 36% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 69%
Kingston DT 100 G2 32GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID 1653 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.5 8.5 9.5 9.6 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 9.5 Write 8.5 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 8 11% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,890 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 73GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 18 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 11.2 24% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 39%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-00ZCT0 320GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 32GB free, PID 00db Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 21.7 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 13.9 27% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U13C9G 2x2GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 10.1 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback