Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 21:19
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 116
51% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 167
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 54.2
Parallax 48
48% 53.5 fps
MRender 44.6
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 50.6
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 253 244 241 249 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 408
Write 262
Mixed 233
SusWrite 243
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 25.3
112% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 183
151% 216 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 128%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
30GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 91 102 99 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 296
Write 116
Mixed 157
SusWrite 96.6
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 19.2
100% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 86.7
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 103
79% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
278GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 64 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 66.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 66
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
700GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 153 149 153 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 151
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 13
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback