MSI MS-7181

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7181 (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060306
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '20 at 07:29
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 2800+ 158 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 52 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 23.3 25% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 22.1 3% 22.7 Pts	64-Core 23.3 1% 23.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 95 94 93 94 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 109 SusWrite 91.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 25.6 88% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 35.9 30% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 69%
Excelstor Technology J640 41GB 36GB free Firmware: V32OA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 42 42 43 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.5% Poor	Read 41.1 Write 43.2 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 40.5 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s

Seagate ST340016A 40GB-$85 338 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 28GB free Firmware: 3.75 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 40 39 40 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 37.9 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 38.8 27% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 23%
StoreJet Transcend 60GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 32GB free, PID 2335 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	9.96% Terrible	Read 21 Write 19.4 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 17.2 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.1% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 1.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.5 4% 1.5 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI MS-7181

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)