Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 119 47% 79.9 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 192 22% 171 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.64 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.99 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 7%
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.1% Below average	Lighting 58.3 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 36.5 48% 50.8 fps	MRender 51.4 Gravity 3.67 Splatting 29.7 23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 116 66 57 49 MB/s Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 242 Write 212 Mixed 213 SusWrite 112 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 23.5 102% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 47.3 64% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 92%
Sandisk SC032G 32GB 542 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 27GB free Firmware: 3.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 94 93 95 96 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 221 Write 70.5 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 94.9 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 11.5 37% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 20 16% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 41%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 777GB free Firmware: AX1A1V SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 100 105 110 107 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 95 64% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 13.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10 PRO-7800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 43%, 1,083 samples	3x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)AMD $59Bench 51%, 6,408 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	3x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	2x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra II 120GBSanDisk $76Bench 76%, 9,139 samples	3x
SSD220 240GBTranscend $38Bench 71%, 12,548 samples	2x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x

RAM
Dark-1600 Dark-1600 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 78 samples	2x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
CM3X2G1333C9 1x2GBCorsairBench 25%, 101 samples	1x

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $76

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16