HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8509
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190510
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	64%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	97% Outstanding	Memory 88.6 1-Core 131 2-Core 281 91% 167 Pts	4-Core 565 8-Core 965 93% 765 Pts	64-Core 835 52% 835 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 95.9 Parallax 94 84% 97.7 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 86.6 Splatting 72.7 74% 93.3 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB 27,018 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 124 56 69 58 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 1,005 Write 731 Mixed 714 SusWrite 114 142% 641 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 51 171% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 214 253% 424 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 203%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 884GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 186 184 184 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 178 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 185 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	560x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	488x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	218x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	363x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	255x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	197x

SSD
SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TBIntelBench 183%, 4,172 samples	269x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	104x
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	67x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	410x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	285x
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $878

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16