Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,579
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 1,004
89% 754 Pts
64-Core 2,815
174% 2,815 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 107
Parallax 95.8
76% 98.4 fps
MRender 90.2
Gravity 86.5
Splatting 90.1
73% 89 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
710GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 1869 1268 1006 1009 1011 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,851
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 1,338
358% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 67.9
265% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,161
DQ Mixed 1,269
950% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 296%
Great: 372%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411030RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 441 438 435 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 386
Mixed 353
SusWrite 442
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 244
210% 310 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
1TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 441 439 436 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 404
Mixed 376
SusWrite 443
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 40.9
144% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 930 922 826 763 687 627 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 137 135 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 161
Write 84.5
Mixed 79
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 83%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
196GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 36 36 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 113
Write 66.8
Mixed 53
SusWrite 33.7
80% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 20.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback