Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 54.2 37% 52.9 Pts	4-Core 64.5 8-Core 65.9 9% 65.2 Pts	64-Core 65.6 4% 65.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 885 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 20D8) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 296.88 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.31 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 23 25 22 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 40.3 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 24.4 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16