Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 06:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 366
53% 389 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.6% Good
Lighting 90.9
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 97.2
74% 93.9 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 68.5
43% 49.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 144 130 158 64 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
WD WD81PURZ-85LWMY0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 93 94 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 98
Mixed 67
SusWrite 94
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
201% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 116%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$81
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 123 122 122 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 134
Mixed 66
SusWrite 122
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 85%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
36GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 82 81 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 139
Write 142
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 81.8
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 72 74 67 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 73.5
Write 74
Mixed 45
SusWrite 72
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.7 7.2 7.2 7.6 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 23
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.6
19% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 20GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback