| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190529 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 20 '20 at 14:43 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
84% 148 Pts
|
63% 512 Pts
|
45% 734 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 31.3 fps
|
27% 33.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 52 58 79 84 96 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
63% 85.8 MB/s
|
137% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
43.4%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
56% 70.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,514 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 389x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 342x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 146x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 84x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |