Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 00:51
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 191
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 314
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 59.4
52% 63.1 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 53.7
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 427
Mixed 306
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 24.8
107% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 169
177% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
54GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 372 395 415 413 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 377
Mixed 403
SusWrite 382
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 46
154% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 274
230% 332 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
166GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 92.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 67
SusWrite 71.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
303GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 119 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 114
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 120
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
168GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 102
SusWrite 108
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback