Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '20 at 03:13
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 217 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 629 61% 502 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 54.7 48% 58.1 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 57.7 47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 44 57 74 59 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 432 Write 391 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 96.9 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 693GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 126 127 130 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 157 Write 147 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 127 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.8% Very good	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 29.5 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	412x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	193x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16