PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X58 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130412 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 22 '20 at 11:26 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 58% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
67%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
27.9%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 100 100 92 94 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
143GB free
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 107 108 110 105 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 30x |
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 24x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 7x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $300 |