Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110 6,703 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 223 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 515 54% 432 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M 2,978 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Dell(1028 15CD) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2632 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 3.41 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 3.73 Splatting 5.48 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMH-256V2M-41 M 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3M84 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 441 Write 269 Mixed 287 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 16.4 69% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 102 106% 179 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 19.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,017x
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	340x
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	192x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	85x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	82x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	51x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16