Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	46.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '20 at 09:51
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 148 2-Core 286 98% 176 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 1,001 93% 774 Pts	64-Core 1,570 97% 1,570 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 153 Parallax 141 16% 105 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 135 Splatting 81.6 103% 133 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1736 1581 1385 1384 1406 1425 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,500 Write 2,223 Mixed 1,814 SusWrite 1486 450% 2,006 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 74.2 250% 86.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,254 DQ Write 875 DQ Mixed 1,093 808% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 80GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 484 484 483 483 484 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 485 Mixed 449 SusWrite 482 108% 479 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 52.8 175% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 348 264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 432GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 89 90 90 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 81.7 Write 85.2 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 88.1 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 83%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB 650 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 59GB free, PID a83a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 17 18 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.35% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 12.2 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 17.7 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.35% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 31.5 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 27.3 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,864x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,609x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	556x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,303x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,321

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16