Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 184 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 510 56% 440 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 8405) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 52.5 31% 42.9 fps	MRender 50.3 Gravity 43.4 Splatting 39.6 36% 44.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q083 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 63 26 38 27 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 452 Write 313 Mixed 314 SusWrite 61 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 7 46% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 292GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 104 105 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 66 SusWrite 104 72% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$27 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 142GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 71 71 70 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 70 Write 69.2 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 69.8 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	226x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	65x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	40x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	15x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16