HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8760w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1630
Memory	19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150312
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '17 at 18:03
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 23,850 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	1-Core 19.2 2-Core 39.4 14% 29.3 Pts	4-Core 70.6 8-Core 154 14% 113 Pts	64-Core 280 19% 280 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M5950 852 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 1630) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 13.2 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 11.3 4% 12.1 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 13.2 3% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$318 70,679 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9260 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 677 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 42 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (F1) Unknown 99 99 46725443984
Poor: 86% Great: 133%
FANTOM HD204UI 2TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 230GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 23 Mixed 23.7 31% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.34 50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 6,926 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.4 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 1,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $241Bench 44%, 3,515 samples	238x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 42%, 32,077 samples	152x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 39%, 23,850 samples	145x

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 1,781 samples	576x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 852 samples	215x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 804 samples	203x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,957 samples	35x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 54%, 6,077 samples	34x
MZ7PA256HMDR-01000 256GBSamsungBench 39%, 194 samples	29x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 250,685 samples	375x
4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 60,379 samples	180x
2x8GBUnknownBench 58%, 104,618 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	AMD RX 590 $180	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360	Nvidia RTX 2060 $324	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24