Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090504
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '17 at 18:26
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 140 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 349 38% 304 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3556) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 373.6 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 41 27% 35.2 fps	MRender 40.2 Gravity 38 Splatting 27.1 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17863 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 606 (B1) Unknown 94 94 63 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 65 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22857943247	43% Average	Read 209 Write 146 Mixed 148 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 16 82% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 15.3 17% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 79GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 159 6883 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1866 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 50519 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1818 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1866 (C2) HDA temperature 111 102 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.3% Average	Read 76.7 Write 66.8 Mixed 74.8 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.18 74% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 57%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 43GB free Firmware: MF6OAA70 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 81 (03) Spinup time 126 126 38687212015 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 676 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 142 142 25 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18309 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 645 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1417 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1417 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 214749413416 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.7% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 98.8 Mixed 119 80% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 91%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID ab2d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 118 Write 109 Mixed 66.5 120% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.52 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.53 68% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	284x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	26x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	79x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	68x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16