Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 609 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0F00) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 1.22 4% 3.73 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 103 83 99 78 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 70.8 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 90.2 51% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	111x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	97x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	138x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	119x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $507

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16