Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111202
Uptime18.7 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 21:51
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 99.3
53% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 284
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Gigabyte(1458 34F5) 1.2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 23.9
18% 26.4 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 24.1
20% 25 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 90 44 56 54 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 382
Write 268
Mixed 290
SusWrite 78.3
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 18.5
61% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 158
131% 188 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 194 195 194 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 132
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 191
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
280GB free
Firmware: GM3OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 75.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 78
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
846GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 143 143 142 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 114
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 143
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
199GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 43
Write 26.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 45.7
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 500GB
412GB free, PID 558c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 262 264 267 271 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 214
Mixed 163
SusWrite 263
296% 219 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 16.8
1,116% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 23.5
1,984% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 139%
Great: 374%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback