Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QA
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 10:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 83
45% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 155
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 340
Asus(1043 1931) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.81 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 8.57
Splatting 6.09
5% 6.22 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 100 108 119 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 51.7
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 113
47% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback