Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 211 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 404 51% 389 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8473) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.81 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 2 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 301 334 319 337 341 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 459 Write 342 Mixed 290 SusWrite 326 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 24.2 86% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 147 122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 53.6 75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	25x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $392

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16