Capital Neo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCapital Neo  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DB65AL
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$20
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 274
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 263
18% 263 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Zotac(19DA 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 35.2
29% 33.5 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 33.9
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$47
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 64 56 64 57 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 120
Write 181
Mixed 161
SusWrite 68
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 12.2
63% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 158
118% 157 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 83%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
285GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.65% Terrible
Read 29
Write 23.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 24.6
6% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 6
19% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Neo Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Capital Neo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback